Federal District Court Filings
Most of the 20+ federal cases filed were based on direct challenges to the subject-matter jurisdiction of state and municipal courts[cite: 14]. Below are key highlights from these ongoing legal proceedings[cite: 14]:
Menes Ankh El v. John Layton
Case No. 1:12-cv-1688
A habeas corpus action challenging state court subject-matter jurisdiction[cite: 14]. This litigation resulted in placement on the Homeland Security Sovereign Citizen Database[cite: 14].
Menes Ankh El and Tyreese Taylor-Bey v. Hill et al
Case No. 1:2013-cv-01471
Initiated federal criminal action against various judges and prosecutors for ongoing violations against the U.S. Constitution[cite: 14].
Menes Ankh El v. STATE OF INDIANA et al.
Case No. 2:15-cv-391
Civil suit brought against judicial officers who systematically refused to prove proper subject-matter jurisdiction[cite: 14].
Menes Ankh El ex rel. WENDELL BROWN v. INDIANA STATE et al.
Case No. 1:22-cv-00410
Civil suit utilizing commercial terminology and standing against municipal corporations for constitutional violations[cite: 14].
Menes Ankh El v. STATE OF INDIANA, COUNTY OF MARION, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Case No. 1:23-cv-01097
Civil suit using Alien's Action for Tort against municipal corporations for false imprisonment without proof of territorial jurisdiction[cite: 14].
Menes Ankh El and Ogbonna Shakur El v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case No. 1:23-cv-01098
Civil action seeking formal recognition of Moorish Republic nationality, standing, and autonomous governance[cite: 14].
Menes Ankh El v. UNITED STATES f/k/a United States in Congress Assembled
Case No. 1:24-cv-01124
Suit challenging forced U.S. citizenship[cite: 14]. The court refused to serve the U.S. Attorney General, effectively refusing to respond on the record[cite: 14].
U.S. Supreme Court Submissions
While several landmark cases have reached the United States Supreme Court, the Court maintains discretionary authority to decline hearing these matters[cite: 14].
1. Menes Ankh El v. Indiana, et al. (Civil Suit) — Docket No. 16-6518[cite: 14]
2. Menes Ankh El v. Laurie Johnson (Habeas Corpus) — Docket No. 17-6806[cite: 14]
3. Menes Ankh El v. Robert Carter, et al. (Habeas Corpus) — Docket No. 19-8152[cite: 14]
4. Menes Ankh El v. Marion County, et al. (Civil Suit) — Docket No. 19-2799[cite: 14]
Transition to International Law & Tribunals
Realizing that an adequate remedy cannot be found within domestic U.S. territorial courts, the Moorish Republic has turned its focus toward the international community[cite: 14]. We recognize that our situation is fundamentally international in nature[cite: 14].
"Our most recent actions include an Application Instituting Proceedings filed directly with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and a formal complaint submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Council."[cite: 14]
Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies Demands Transition to Public International Law and Indigenous Self-Determination[cite: 14].